Dozen Nonprofits Press State Supreme Court to Affirm Mount Laurel Doctrine

by Richard W. Brown on June 19, 2011

Urge Support for Continuing Efforts to
Provide Affordable Housing for All New Jersey Residents

The Melissa Riggio ResidenceOn June 15, 2011, representatives from twelve nonprofit organizations, including Monarch Housing Associates, submitted a total of four “” briefs to the in In the Matter of the Adoption of N.J.A.C. 5:96 and 5:97 by the New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing, Docket No. 67,126, urging the Court to affirm key aspects of the Mount Laurel doctrine to ensure the availability of housing that is affordable to all the residents of the State. This broad coalition of national, state, and local groups includes civil rights advocates, smart growth and affordable housing organizations, supportive housing providers, and others.

Each of the briefs is summarized below, along with contact information for each organization and counsel.

Supportive Housing Brief: These providers of supportive housing focus on the discriminatory impact of ’s regulations on individuals with . There exists an “acute shortage” of affordable housing for individuals with that will only be exacerbated if ’s Third Round Rules are implemented. ’s rules threaten to undo the success that the Mount Laurel doctrine has achieved for .

Smart Growth Brief: The smart growth groups focus on the critical role that the development of affordable housing plays in the advancement of the State’s economic, environmental, and equitable health through sound planning. The brief argues that the Third Round Rules promulgated by the New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing (“COAH”) would undermine the fundamental principles of the Mount Laurel doctrine in two ways: (1) by allowing municipalities to decide for themselves whether to incur any affordable housing obligation; and (2) by permitting municipalities to consider only their local interests in making such decisions, ignoring the needs of low-income families throughout the region.

Civil Liberties Brief: In response to the State’s request for almost complete deference to COAH, the ACLU-NJ’s brief reminds the Court that it has a constitutional role and obligation to ensure that the actions of the state agency are consistent with constitutional requirements and are not arbitrary or capricious. Further, the brief explains that the basic principle of the Mt. Laurel doctrine — that the “general welfare” clause of the NJ Constitution imposes upon municipalities an affirmative obligation to provide reasonable opportunities for affordable housing to meet its fair share of the region’s needs — has a longstanding place in our constitutional jurisprudence, and should be upheld.

Racial Integration Brief: The minority advocacy organizations emphasize the detrimental effect that COAH’s Third Round Rules will have on racial integration through access to affordable housing. According to both groups, a fundamental purpose of the Mount Laurel doctrine is the reduction of segregation in housing, a goal that cannot be accomplished under the challenged regulations with their allowance for municipalities to exercise unfettered discretion.

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter
For Email Newsletters you can trust

Monarch Housing Associates

Building Homes
Transforming Lives
1990-2012


Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: