Overall, US Cities as well as NY/Newark/Jersey City Experienced Uneven Economic Growth
The National Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC) reported on a new report showing that overall, U.S. cities are experiencing uneven economic growth.
The Metropolitan Policy Program at the Brookings Institution released its annual report, Metro Monitor, the week of February 19.
- Metro Monitor tracks economic progress in the 100 largest metropolitan areas in the U.S. using an Inclusive Growth Index.
- The report shows widespread but uneven progress across most metropolitan areas between 2015 and 2016, and racial disparities in relative poverty persist.
- New York City/Newark/Jersey City was one of the metropolitan areas tracked in the report and ranked 81 out of 100.
- Between 2015-2016, the productivity in this metropolitan area dropped by -0.8; the average wage grew by only 0.4% and the standard of living grew by only 0.8%.
The Inclusive Growth Index measures growth along three dimensions: economic growth, prosperity, and inclusion.
- Economic growth is measured by the changes in gross metropolitan product (GMP), total number of jobs, and number of jobs at young firms. Between 2015 and 2016, 93 of the 100 metro areas experienced increases in GMP and 96 added jobs. The construction, finance, and high tech sectors tended to be the primary drivers behind increases in GMP, while the oil and gas and government sectors tended to slow GMP growth. Metro areas with large manufacturing, government, and education sectors showed slower job growth. Metro areas on the east and west coasts and in the Sunbelt experienced the most growth.
- Prosperity is measured by the changes in average wage per job, productivity (GMP divided by total jobs), and standard of living (GMP per capita). A majority of metropolitan areas experienced growth in average wages, driven mostly by services, tech, construction and health care, while declines in wages were associated with metros reliant on energy, manufacturing, and government spending (e.g., state capitols). Despite increasing wages, productivity declined in 64 metro areas, mainly because in metros with job increases, output did not increase correspondingly, reducing the amount of output per worker. The 87 metros with increases in standard of living were also metros with increases in employment and productivity.
The report did not address how the employment and wage changes match up with rental housing costs (nor did it deal with the shortage of affordable rental homes and housing cost burdens for different income groups.